KNOWLEDGE CO-PRODUCTION

Introduction

Research does not always lead to better decision-making and management, a problem known as the knowledge-action gap (Cook et al., 2013), in part because it excludes the communities experiencing the impacts and outcomes of research and resulting management decisions. Beyond being impacted by knowledge outcomes, individuals and communities also possess knowledge that can make important contributions to both science and management from different perspectives (Bartlett et al., 2012; Berkes, 2003). Uniting knowledge systems can produce a richer understanding of a system and alleviate distrust and power differentials that are associated with knowledge possession (Nadasdy, 1999).

In addition to imperfect knowledge within Western science, this project acknowledges and values multiple ways of knowing, which including both Indigenous Traditional Knowledge and the local ecological knowledge and experiences of fishermen, conservationists, local residents, and other groups who interact with the river regularly. This perspective is known as knowledge co-production, described as “the contribution of multiple knowledge sources, ways of knowing, and perspectives from different user groups with the goal of co-creating knowledge and information.” (Cooke et al., 2021). The research process involves interested parties and knowledge owners (see Box 1 for definition of terms from our 2024 paper) in activities ranging from identifying research needs to study design, data collection, interpretation, and evaluation.

Methods for knowledge co-production

Outcome 3 of this project involves documenting how different groups with extended experience with the river understand the relationships between river health and management actions. Interviews and surveys under the Community Experiences element of this project are interpreted into conceptual mappings of the relationships between objectives for the river, management actions, and the people and ecosystem processes that connect them.

The knowledge owners considered under this project, for whom separate knowledge models will be generated, are the Yurok people, conservation advocates, water users, commercial fisherman, and local residents.

Through working groups with each knowledge owner, the knowledge models will compared amongst themselves and with ecological models of river health to: a) learn more about the system being studied; b) identify points of consistency and inconsistency across knowledge models; c) foster transparency that increases understanding on rationale and outcomes; d) consider the assumptions that underlie our undertanding of a system; and d) identify key knowledge gaps within each system that contributes to uncertainty in decisions.

2024 update

Preliminary conceptual mappings have been generated for the groups with whom interviews have been completed. Interviews with the Yurok people, fishermen, and local residents are underway. Working groups with each of the knowledge owners will be conducted in spring and summer 2025.

Knowledge co-production team

Desiree Tullos, PhD, PE (OR)
Professor, Water Resources Engineering
Oregon State University

Kristine Alford
PhD StudentOregon
State University